<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The CERF Blog &#187; housing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clucerf.org/blog/tag/housing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clucerf.org/blog</link>
	<description>Center for Economic Research and Forecasting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:10:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>United States Housing Starts</title>
		<link>http://www.clucerf.org/blog/2010/06/16/united-states-housing-starts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clucerf.org/blog/2010/06/16/united-states-housing-starts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Hamilton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Starts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clucerf.org/blog/2010/06/16/united-states-housing-starts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The commerce department reported today that United States housing starts fell from 659 thousand to 593 thousand from April to May. This was the largest drop in starts since 1991. As well, building permits, which are an indicator of future starts declined to a one-year low.
This is bearish news for the United States economy, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The commerce department reported today that United States housing starts fell from 659 thousand to 593 thousand from April to May. This was the largest drop in starts since 1991. As well, building permits, which are an indicator of future starts declined to a one-year low.</p>
<p>This is bearish news for the United States economy, but I bring something more important to your attention. From the chart below, you can see that in the year 2000 the United States typically experienced housing starts at the one and a half million home annual rate. This was pre-bubble, the bubble-rate during 2005 and 2006 was about 2 million starts. At least as important, the United States economy has been mired in the low housing start level of 500 to 600 thousand since November of 2008 with no sign of breaking out of this regime.</p>
<p>Our United States GDP forecast for each of the remaining quarters in 2010 is approximately 100 basis points below the consensus forecast. This measure of economic activity is partly why our forecast is bearish, other reasons include weakness in the Household sector’s balance sheet, and on-going problems in banking. I ask this question for my competitors, the other forecasters who in the aggregate are the consensus, how could real GDP growth be three percent when housing starts remain this low?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.clucerf.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/starts.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-large wp-image-512" title="starts" src="http://www.clucerf.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/starts-1024x745.jpg" alt="" width="450" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clucerf.org/blog/2010/06/16/united-states-housing-starts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California&#8217;s Housing Market</title>
		<link>http://www.clucerf.org/blog/2009/08/07/californias-housing-market/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clucerf.org/blog/2009/08/07/californias-housing-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 20:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kirk Lesh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clucerf.org/blog/2009/08/07/californias-housing-market/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The California Association of Realtors (CAR) recently released its June sales and price report.  According to CAR, the median price for an existing, single-family home declined 26.4 percent compared to a year earlier.  Home sales increased 20.1 percent from June 2008.  The index for unsold inventory fell to 4.1 months.  Is this good news for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The California Association of Realtors (CAR) recently released its June sales and price report.  According to CAR, the median price for an existing, single-family home declined 26.4 percent compared to a year earlier.  Home sales increased 20.1 percent from June 2008.  The index for unsold inventory fell to 4.1 months.  Is this good news for Californians?<span id="more-42"></span></p>
<p>Yes!  In order for California’s devastated housing market to recover home sales must increase.  The excess inventory of homes needs to be reduced before prices can stabilize.  June marks the 15<sup>th</sup> consecutive month home sales have increased in California.  This is certainly welcome news.</p>
<p>CAR’s unsold inventory index fell to 4.1 months in June.  This represents a 46.1 percent decline from a year earlier.  More importantly, this is a significant decline from the January 2008 peak of 16.6 months.</p>
<p>While home owners do not like to hear about falling home prices, the reported 26.4 percent decline in home prices is somewhat misleading.  The composition of home sales has changed dramatically.  Distressed properties, foreclosures and short sales, now account for a significant proportion of all homes sold.  As these properties are sold at a discount they tend to reduce median home prices.</p>
<p>This implies that traditional, non-distressed homes have not lost as much value.  To be sure, home values in California have declined.  However, it is likely that the values of non-distressed homes have not declined as much as the reported decline in median home prices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clucerf.org/blog/2009/08/07/californias-housing-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
