<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The CERF Blog &#187; GDP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clucerf.org/blog/tag/gdp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clucerf.org/blog</link>
	<description>Center for Economic Research and Forecasting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:10:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>United States 2010 Q1 Gross Domestic Product</title>
		<link>http://www.clucerf.org/blog/2010/04/30/united-states-2010-q1-gross-domestic-product/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clucerf.org/blog/2010/04/30/united-states-2010-q1-gross-domestic-product/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Hamilton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forecast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clucerf.org/blog/2010/04/30/united-states-2010-q1-gross-domestic-product/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[United States Gross Domestic Product expanded at a 3.2 percent pace in quarter one of 2010, according to the preliminary estimate released today. This was very close to our forecast of 3.1 percent. This expansion was the result of 3.6% growth in personal consumption expenditures and a $50 billion increase in real private inventory spending, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>United States Gross Domestic Product expanded at a 3.2 percent pace in quarter one of 2010, according to the preliminary estimate released today. This was very close to our forecast of 3.1 percent. This expansion was the result of 3.6% growth in personal consumption expenditures and a $50 billion increase in real private inventory spending, even though disposable income did not see a measurable increase. Fixed Investment growth was essentially flat at 0.7 percent growth. This is because the expansion in equipment and software investment was offset by declines in both residential and commercial real estate investment.</p>
<p>Government consumption and investment expenditures declined by 1.8 percent, driven by a 3.8 percent decline in State and Local Government. Federal Government expenditures, both defense and non-defense, were up modestly. (State and Local Government expenditures are 60 percent of Government spending.)</p>
<p>Exports grew about six percent while imports grew about nine percent.</p>
<p>This press release is based on preliminary data and will be revised. However, it appears to indicate a few things:</p>
<p>• Residential real estate investment is not out of the woods yet<br />
• Commercial real estate investment is also not out of the woods yet<br />
• The strength of consumption and the weakness in disposable personal income imply that the savings rate is falling. This has at least a few implications:<br />
o If the household sector does not rebuild its balance sheet future spending will be weak<br />
o The decline in the quantity of loanable-funds, other factors being equal, would contribute to a rise in interest rates. This does not necessarily imply that rates will rise, as this is just one of many factors impacting interest rates at this time.<br />
o Household default rates and personal bankruptcies will remain high<br />
• In contrast to the fourth quarter of 2009 where trade boosted the economy, trade was a drag on the economy in the first quarter of 2010<br />
• It is difficult for the Federal Government to spend enough to offset the declines in State and Local government spending, thus negating the Federal Keynesian-style fiscal expansion policy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clucerf.org/blog/2010/04/30/united-states-2010-q1-gross-domestic-product/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How’s That Recovery Going?</title>
		<link>http://www.clucerf.org/blog/2010/01/14/how%e2%80%99s-that-recovery-going/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clucerf.org/blog/2010/01/14/how%e2%80%99s-that-recovery-going/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Watkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cash for Clunkers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic activity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inventory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States GDP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clucerf.org/blog/2010/01/14/how%e2%80%99s-that-recovery-going/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today’s data releases highlight the challenges facing those who claim we are in a recovery.  The December retail sales volume, down 0.3 percent from November, was perhaps the most shocking number to the optimists out there.  This was almost a full percentage point below “consensus expectations,” which were for 0.5 percent growth.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today’s data releases highlight the challenges facing those who claim we are in a recovery.  The December retail sales volume, down 0.3 percent from November, was perhaps the most shocking number to the optimists out there.  This was almost a full percentage point below “consensus expectations,” which were for 0.5 percent growth.  So much for the Christmas pickup that was being touted as a sign of resurgence; preliminary numbers always need to be interpreted with caution.</p>
<p>New unemployment claims also rose to 444,000, again exceeding “consensus expectations.”</p>
<p>There was also a report that will receive much less attention, but it is important.  Inventories increased in November, the most recent month for which data are available.  If inventories were increasing over the Christmas shopping season, and sales were declining, retailers ended the year with excessive inventory.  That means reduced production in the first and second quarters of 2010.</p>
<p>2009’s third quarter output (GDP) growth was positive, and many expect a very impressive positive number for the fourth quarter, some as high as five percent.  If the fourth quarter does come in with a strong GDP growth rate, it will be hailed as the harbinger of a soon-to-be-realized vigorous recovery.</p>
<p>Don’t buy that, and you won’t be disappointed.</p>
<p>That vigorous recovery may eventually come, but it is unlikely to come in 2010.  Whatever growth generated in second-half of 2009 was government-supported consumption, ephemeral, not a solid foundation for economic growth, certainly not the basis for sustained vigorous job growth.</p>
<p>A vigorous recovery will be a result of investment, technological growth, and improved productivity.  Recent productivity numbers have been encouraging, but in large part, they are probably the result of firms downsizing.  Technological growth and solid job growth require investment, and that is the problem.</p>
<p>Our banks are in no condition to fund any vigorous expansion.  Indeed, bank loans have been declining since October 2008.  Businesses and consumers remain over-leveraged, unable to increase spending on consumption, unable to invest, desperately trying to reduce debt.</p>
<p>We won’t see a vigorous recovery until balance sheets are improved and banks can lend.</p>
<p>Government programs haven’t helped.  Most of the spending programs have been consumption based instead of investment based.  Some have been outright counterproductive, programs such as foreclosure-delay, paying interest on bank deposits at the Fed, and cash for clunkers.  Even worse, the banking problem has been ignored, and now new taxes on banks are being discussed.  That is as bad an idea as I’ve heard in a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clucerf.org/blog/2010/01/14/how%e2%80%99s-that-recovery-going/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Second Estimate of 3rd Quarter GDP</title>
		<link>http://www.clucerf.org/blog/2009/11/24/the-second-estimate-of-3rd-quarter-gdp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clucerf.org/blog/2009/11/24/the-second-estimate-of-3rd-quarter-gdp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Hamilton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BEA's Second Estimate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CERF Forecast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clucerf.org/blog/2009/11/24/the-second-estimate-of-3rd-quarter-gdp/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The BEA’s second estimate of total United States Economic activity, just out today, is 2.8 percent.  This is down 70 basis points from the “advance” estimate published a month ago.  The change in the estimate was driven mainly by upward revisions to imports and downward revisions to personal consumption expenditures and to nonresidential [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The BEA’s second estimate of total United States Economic activity, just out today, is 2.8 percent.  This is down 70 basis points from the “advance” estimate published a month ago.  The change in the estimate was driven mainly by upward revisions to imports and downward revisions to personal consumption expenditures and to nonresidential fixed investment that were partly offset by an upward revision to exports.</p>
<p>Our mid-November United States forecast for fourth quarter real GDP growth was for a fall of 2.6 percent, driven by the advance estimate, so if we ran our model with the new information, our fourth quarter forecast would fall a bit.  The economics news on all fronts continues to confirm ongoing weakness.  In particular, data releases on the housing market continue to be discouraging.  Today, a report was published that stated that 10.7 million United States homeowners were “under-water”, indicating that they owed more on their mortgage than the estimated current market value.  In addition, recent economic indicators continue to lead us to believe that the Holiday shopping season will be weak.  Our fourth quarter forecast for the seasonally adjusted annualized growth rate of the United States economy, to be published December 16, will likely be in the range of a fall of 2.5 percent to a fall of 3 percent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clucerf.org/blog/2009/11/24/the-second-estimate-of-3rd-quarter-gdp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Recession Will Not Really be Over &#8211; We will see a W</title>
		<link>http://www.clucerf.org/blog/2009/09/02/the-recession-will-not-really-be-over-we-will-see-a-w/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clucerf.org/blog/2009/09/02/the-recession-will-not-really-be-over-we-will-see-a-w/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 16:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Hamilton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clucerf.org/blog/2009/09/02/the-recession-will-not-really-be-over-we-will-see-a-w/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark Zandi declared “the recession is over” on Tuesday September 1, 2009.  All of the economists at CERF would like this to be true.  However, we suspect that this is not true.  Mark’s declaration was based in part on the ISM manufacturing activity index data release.  The economy has benefited from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark Zandi declared “the recession is over” on Tuesday September 1, 2009.  All of the economists at CERF would like this to be true.  However, we suspect that this is not true.  Mark’s declaration was based in part on the ISM manufacturing activity index data release.  The economy has benefited from expenditures on vehicles in the Cash-for-Clunkers program.  Certain other household expenditures rose as well.  World trade experienced a blip and the Ted Spread fell a little indicating that risk aversion is returning to more normal levels.  Investment in inventories may also see a spike in the second half of 2009.  </p>
<p>While it is possible that GDP growth will be positive in the 3rd quarter, we believe that the private economy will be weak for some time to come.  The evolution of this recession could look like a “W” or an “L”.  GDP growth rates will be small, sometimes negative or near zero, with occasional bounces that will be driven by temporary household and/or government expenditures.  If GDP is recalculated without foreign or government influences, then 2009 quarter 2 economic activity declined by 4 percent, see my August 5 blog on this topic.  Real estate delinquencies and foreclosures continue at historically high levels.  It appears that the tide of commercial foreclosures will continue to rise.  Foreclosures hit the economy hard, having serious negative consequences for both Main Street and Wall Street.  US economic growth might be positive in 2009 quarter 3, but the factors driving economic activity may conspire to reduce GDP growth in late 2009 or early 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clucerf.org/blog/2009/09/02/the-recession-will-not-really-be-over-we-will-see-a-w/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s working</title>
		<link>http://www.clucerf.org/blog/2009/08/06/its-working/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clucerf.org/blog/2009/08/06/its-working/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 21:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Watkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clucerf.org/blog/2009/08/06/its-working/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I always figured that the administration would take credit for any eventual economic recovery, but I also figured that they would wait for the recovery.  Wrong.  Cristina Romer, perhaps buoyed by yesterday&#8217;s GDP release and today&#8217;s job data, says that the stimulus is working.
That may be a bit premature.  Dan discussed the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always figured that the administration would take credit for any eventual economic recovery, but I also figured that they would wait for the recovery.  Wrong.  Cristina Romer, perhaps buoyed by yesterday&#8217;s GDP release and today&#8217;s job data, says that the stimulus is working.<span id="more-18"></span></p>
<p>That may be a bit premature.  Dan discussed the GDP numbers yesterday, but there are more issues.  Deutsche Bank thinks that half of U.S. mortgages will be upside down by 2011 and retail is suffering.  Tomorrow’s jobs data could bring more bad news.<br />
The fact is that after the housing crash and financial meltdown, financial institutions, businesses, and consumers were over-leveraged.  After months of recession, consumers and businesses are in even worse shape.  And now, the government is also over-leveraged.  Where does the recovery come from?</p>
<p>Some are hanging their hats on inventory rebuilding, but that is a one-time shot, especially if the holiday season is as weak as we expect.  Some are hanging their hats on the housing market, but at best that will only stop the bleeding.</p>
<p>The problem with claiming victory now is that the administration risks ridicule and losing citizens’ confidence.  I don’t see how that helps the administration or the economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clucerf.org/blog/2009/08/06/its-working/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
